W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > May 2003

Re: PASWA, Include and Protocol Bindings

From: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 10:59:14 -0400
To: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
Cc: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-id: <CC795B88-822E-11D7-B7C2-0003937568DC@sun.com>

On Thursday, May 8, 2003, at 20:05 US/Eastern, Mark Nottingham wrote:

>> So yes, C and D are after dumb hops. I thought the promise of PASWA 
>> was
>> supposed to be that the on the wire serialization was transparent ;-).
> And it is! It's only when you want to play funny games with things like
> optimisations of signatures that you have to make special allowances ;)
Which could be restated as: it is as long as you're prepared to take 
the hit of base64 encoding/decoding.

Attachments is supposed to be a mechanism to avoid that :-o.


Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Friday, 9 May 2003 10:59:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:23 UTC