W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > May 2003

Re: final decision on well-formedness checking

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 11:16:10 +0600
Message-ID: <016c01c31520$f0f5c040$a500a8c0@lankabook2>
To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> writes:
> Just to make sure I understand, you are advocating something like:
> 1. Intermediary receives SOAP message
> 2. Intermediary begins to parse stream 
> 3. Intermediary gets to end of soap:Header. Everything is
> well-formed up to this point and intermediary has processed all headers
> targetted at it.
> 4. Intermediary stops doing XML parsing and just streams the rest
> of the message ( the soap:Body and descendants, plus the closing
> </soap:Envelope> to the next node.
> Is that roughly whay you're looking for?

Yep, that would do great.

If something were indeed wrong within the soap:Body say, something
else will break later down the route and I'd like that to be "ok".

Received on Thursday, 8 May 2003 01:15:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:23 UTC