W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > February 2003

RE: SOAP-Encoding valueType attrib decl omission?

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 12:00:55 -0800
Message-ID: <68B95AA1648D1840AB0083CC63E57AD60A1B3FD0@red-msg-06.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, "David Fallside" <fallside@us.ibm.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>


Right, would be good to check that test implementations use qualified id
and ref attributes [10].

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com

[10] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part2.html#idattr

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Martin Gudgin [mailto:mgudgin@microsoft.com] 
>Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:58
>To: David Fallside; xml-dist-app@w3.org
>
>
>Yes, this was an ommision, as was the fact that id and ref 
>were not made global. I've fixed these in the editors copy[1]
>
>Gudge
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap-encoding.xsd
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Fallside [mailto:fallside@us.ibm.com]
>> Sent: 12 February 2003 09:13
>> To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
>> Cc: xmlp-comments@w3.org
>> Subject: SOAP-Encoding valueType attrib decl omission?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The CR and Ed Copy versions of the SOAP-Encoding schema
>> (http://www.w3.org/2002/12/soap-encoding) do not appear to 
>contain an 
>> attribute declaration for valueType (see
>http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/CR-soap12-part2-20021219/#valueTypeat
>tr). We (the SOAP implementer's group) suspect this is a 
>simple omission, yes?
>
>............................................
>David C. Fallside, IBM
>Ext Ph: 530.477.7169
>Int  Ph: 544.9665
>fallside@us.ibm.com
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 15:02:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:13 GMT