Re: treatment of ns prefixes by intermediaries from Rich Salz on 2003-02-07 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from February 2003)

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 13:04:11 -0500
To: David Fallside <fallside@us.ibm.com>
CC: xml-dist-app@w3.org, xmlp-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <3E43F51B.5020806@datapower.com>

> This question came up during an implementer's interop test session: Is an
> intermediary obliged to preserve namespace prefixes? The spec says nothing
> explicitly (that we could find) but appears to implicitly oblige
> intermediaries to preserve them. What did the WG intend?

Since [prefix] is an EII I would assume it's preserved.

If not, then signatures break.
	/r$

Received on Friday, 7 February 2003 13:04:14 UTC