W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > December 2003

Bad link in specs [was: SOAP 1.1 w3c Recommendation ??]

From: Scott Nichol <snichol@computer.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:42:26 -0500
Message-ID: <028c01c3c5b8$361fbd90$6401a8c0@northgate>
To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

Please forgive me for barging in on this list.

I am not sure to whom I should bring attention that the specs, namely the Primer (http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part0/) and Messaging Framework (http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/) contain the same bad link for SOAP 1.1.  Both point the user to http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP/, which *was* SOAP 1.1, but which is now the Messaging Framework.  SOAP 1.1 can, in fact, be found at [1] below (which I found in an old post to this list by Martin Gudgin).

Amusingly, the document at [2] below also has bad links for SOAP 1.1.

Scott Nichol

> If you have to work with SOAP 1.1 then the Note[1] you found IS the
> latest spec. You might also take a look at the WS-I Basic Profile[2]
> which clarifies some of the ambiguities in SOAP 1.1 ( amongst other
> things ).
> 
> Gudge
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/
> [2]
> http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/Basic/2003-06/BasicProfile-1.0-BdAD.html
Received on Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:46:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:15 GMT