Personally, I don't quite see this as very different from what we have today, or from what Gudge proposed earlier, section headings apart. (I.e. I feel the spec is ok as is.) Jean-Jacques. Joseph Reagle wrote: > Role Name: > next > Identifier: > http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/next > Definition > Any SOAP node that receives and processing a SOAP message as defined > in section 2.6 > Conformance: > By definition, all SOAP nodes except the originating node MUST > conform to this role.Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 03:37:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:41:54 GMT