W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > September 2002

Re: LC Issue 250: closed, editorial: text changed

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 13:12:36 -0400
To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
Cc: "Hoelzing, Gerd" <gerd.hoelzing@sap.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-Id: <200209261312.36288.reagle@w3.org>

On Thursday 26 September 2002 12:50 pm, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:
> 1) What is the identifier of a particular role
> 2) What are the requirements to a SOAP node acting in that particular
> role
> 3) How are roles used in the SOAP processing model
>
> As you mention, the text we have discussed cover 1) and 2). The third is
> covered in section 2.6 which states that the concept of roles is
> integral to the SOAP processing model. For example, the first step in
> the processing model is to determine the set of roles a SOAP node acts
> in:
>
> "1. Determine the set of roles in which the node is to act. The contents
> of the SOAP envelope, including any SOAP header blocks and the SOAP
> body, MAY be inspected in making such determination."

Ok, but *where* is the next role *actually* defined? For example, behaviours 
for a ultimateReceiver are specified throughout the specification (perhaps 
it would be nice to have a conformance section which gathered them) but I'm 
still at a lost for next.
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 13:12:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:11 GMT