Noah, sorry I'm replying this late. I think that per the serialization rules it may be exactly as you're writing, the problem is that before the editor's (Gudge's) copy with inbound-only and outbound-only edges such edges were not allowed - because the common understanding of a graph is that there are nodes and that edges always connect two nodes; and the Data Model didn't say that the graphs were not the common graphs. Best regards Jacek Kopecky Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation http://www.systinet.com/ On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 20:15, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > > I know this feels like a dumb question, but I'm confused (and I wrote some > of the original text.) Gudge: in you proposed resolution or resolutions, > what is the graph structure corresponding to the seemingly simple > fragment: > > > > <A env:encodingStyle="...soap encoding..."> <!--struct--> > <B>1</B> > <C>2</C> > </A> > > Am I right that, per the serialization rules, this is > > > | > | > | A > | > ----------- > | Struct | > ----------- > | | > | | > B| |C > | | > "1" "2" > > > So, what I'm asking is: do I have this right, and if so, do we have a > coherent story about the (lack of) source of edge A? I see that [1] has > been updated to account for this. Is this agreed-to? If so, it's OK with > me, just making sure I understand what we're doing. Many thanks. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part2.xml#graphedges > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 > IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676 > One Rogers Street > Cambridge, MA 02142 > ------------------------------------------------------------------ >Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2002 03:59:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:41:54 GMT