W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > September 2002

Re: Updated proposal for Issue 302

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 21:00:15 -0400
To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF911B7EAC.4A192071-ON85256C37.0004BE5B@lotus.com>

Martin Gudgin suggests:

>> Thus unless anyone STRONGLY objects to the notion 
>> of an inbound only edge, I suggest we leave in 
>> the text about 'An edge MAY have only a
>> terminating graph node, that is be inbound only.' 

+1.  Not broken, and too late in the game for surgery at the level of what 
an EII represents, unless no good alternatives exist.  I think Gudge's 
proposal above is fine, and is less disruptive.  Thanks.

Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
Received on Monday, 16 September 2002 21:01:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:21 UTC