W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > September 2002

RE: Issue 298: RPC array representation unneccesary

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 05:04:00 -0700
Message-ID: <92456F6B84D1324C943905BEEAE0278E02A9F6C7@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

The feedback we have internally is that the distinction is unnecessary,
so we support removing the array representation for an RPC invocation.

Gudge

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Gudgin [mailto:mgudgin@microsoft.com] 
> Sent: 31 August 2002 23:00
> To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> Subject: Issue 298: RPC array representation unneccesary
> 
> 
> 
> I'm inclined to agree with the commentator[1] on this, the 
> only difference between the struct and array case really is 
> that duplicate edge labels are allowed in the array case. I'm 
> not convinced of the utility of that distinction and I think 
> the spec would be clearer if we only speced the struct case. 
> That said, I'd like to defer this issue for a week while 
> Henrik and I get some more feedback from implementers inside 
> Microsoft.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Gudge
> 
> [1] [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x298
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 16 September 2002 08:04:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:11 GMT