W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > September 2002

Re: Issue 374: use of term "part" in attachment feature document

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 11:02:33 +0200
Message-ID: <3D859E29.2030608@crf.canon.fr>
To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
CC: xml-dist-app@w3.org

Personally, I'd recommend no-action, since the glossary 
section[1] already contains definition for "Primary SOAP message 
part" and "Secondary part". This, IMO, is enough to disambiguate 
the term "part".

Jean-Jacques.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-af-20020814/#terminology

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:
> 
> In connection with issue 374 [0] I took an action item to provide a
> clarifying sentence indicating that the term "part" in AF [1] is not
> related to the term used in other contexts like WSDL and MIME.
> 
> The proposal is that we in section 3 "Terminology" [3] add a sentence so
> that the definition of a Compound SOAP structure reads (last sentence is
> new):
> 
> * * * * *
> 
> Compound SOAP structure 
> 
> A compound SOAP structure consists of a primary SOAP message part and
> zero or more related secondary parts. The use of the term "part" in this
> specification is independent of its use in other specifications and
> should not be assumed to be identical.
> 
> * * * * *
> 
> Comments?
> 
> Henrik Frystyk Nielsen 
> mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com 
> 
> [0] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues.html#x375
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-af-20020814/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-af-20020814/#terminology
> 
Received on Monday, 16 September 2002 05:02:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:11 GMT