- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 11:55:37 -0700
- To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
In general, I would agree with this. As further justification, we might want to add a few things that makes a MUST requirement hard to enforce: 1) We don't enforce any max number of URIs to be used in a SOAP message which could then be interpreted as saying that we require infinite buffering on a SOAP node. 2) Related to 1), we don't enforce any max size on a SOAP message itself 3) The current text makes it clear that "Any SOAP node MUST be able to handle the length of any URI that it publishes" so we do have a MUST requirement for any given SOAP node. Henrik >I propose that this issue[1] is a duplicate of[2] and should >be closed with no action. > >Gudge > >[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x358 >[2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x336 [3] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part1.xml#useofuris
Received on Thursday, 12 September 2002 14:56:08 UTC