W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > September 2002

Re: SOAP schema bugs?

From: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 09:57:54 -0400
Cc: soapbuilders@yahoogroups.com, xml-dist-app@w3c.org
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Message-Id: <24872870-BF45-11D6-B861-0003937568DC@sun.com>

The LC WD contains the following text in [1].

"The encodingStyle attribute information item MAY only appear on:

1.  A SOAP header block (see 5.2.1 SOAP header block).

2.  A child element information item of the SOAP Body element 
information item (see 5.3.1 SOAP Body child Element).

3.  A child element information item of the SOAP Detail element 
information item (see 5.4.5.1 SOAP detail entry).

4.  Any descendent of 1, 2, and 3 above."

Therefore I think the schema for the 1.2 Envelope EII is correct.

Regards,
Marc.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-part1-20020626/#soapencattr

On Friday, Aug 30, 2002, at 12:38 US/Eastern, Rich Salz wrote:

>
> The schema definitions for both SOAP 1.1 and 1.2 seem to have a 
> problem. The definition of the Envelope item has this:
>    <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax" />
> Since, for exmaple, the SOAP encodingStyle attribute is allowed on the 
> Envelope element (as in Example 1 of the SOAP 1.1 spec), shouldn't 
> ##other really be ##any ?
> 	/r$
>
>
--
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
XML Technology Center, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 09:57:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:11 GMT