W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > September 2002

Re: Issue 292: Which fault code takes precedence BadArguments or MissingId

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 16:43:50 +0200 (CEST)
To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209011638230.14617-100000@mail.idoox.com>

 Gudge,
 I don't know if I agree with this simple resolution. If we make 
it so, we lose the information that an ID was missing. 
 I believe the ideal solution is one where the fault code is
env:Sender/rpc:BadArguments/enc:MissingID. I think we can achive
this by saying in [2] that "if other subcodes are available (e.g.
MissingID if SOAP Encoding is used), they SHOULD be subcodes to
the BadArguments subcode".
 What do you think?

                   Jacek Kopecky

                   Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation
                   http://www.systinet.com/



On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Martin Gudgin wrote:

 > 
 > I propose we close this issue[1]  by adding text to[2] stating that the
 > rpc:BadArguments faultcode takes precedence over the MissingID faultcode
 > ( and others of that ilk )
 > 
 > Gudge
 > 
 > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x292
 > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part2/#rpcfaults
 > 
Received on Sunday, 1 September 2002 10:43:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:11 GMT