W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2002

RE: Discussion summary: Proposal for clarifying relationship between SOAP modules and features

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:45:40 -0800
Message-ID: <68B95AA1648D1840AB0083CC63E57AD6098033C8@red-msg-06.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: "David Fallside" <fallside@us.ibm.com>, "Noah Mendelsohn" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "XMLP Public" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, "Herve Ruellan" <ruellan@crf.canon.fr>


I am generally fine with this but would it be ok to say 

   A SOAP module realizes *zero* or more SOAP features

I don't think we prevent a SOAP module to be written without calling out
any particular SOAP features (i.e. specifying them according to the
rules in the SOAP 1.2 spec)?

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr] 
>Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 02:47
>To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
>Cc: David Fallside; Noah Mendelsohn; XMLP Public; Herve Ruellan
>Suggestions for B):
>The term 'SOAP module' refers to the specification of the 
>syntax and semantics of one or more SOAP header blocks. *A 
>SOAP module realizes one or more SOAP features.* A module 
>specification adheres to the following rules. It:
>and C):
>A SOAP Module is a specification that contains the combined 
>syntax and semantics of SOAP header blocks specified according 
>to the rules in 3.2 SOAP Modules. *A SOAP module realizes one 
>or more SOAP features.* </revised>
>I can live with D).
>I am fine with your other changes.
Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2002 12:46:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:22 UTC