W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2002

Re: encodingStyle permitted locations

From: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:41:56 -0500
Cc: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Message-Id: <F5EBBB0D-FBF6-11D6-94CF-0003937568DC@sun.com>

On Tuesday, Nov 19, 2002, at 14:04 US/Eastern, 
noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:

> Since "MAY only" isn't really a construction with clear normative
> implications, how 'bout:  "MUST NOT appear among the [children] of any
> envelope information item except the following (on which it MAY 
> appear):"
>
+1, but s/[children]/[attributes]/ and s/envelope information item/SOAP 
element information item/.

Marc.

> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
> IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
> Sent by: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org
> 11/19/02 01:51 PM
>
>
>         To:     Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
>         cc:     XMLP Dist App <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, (bcc: Noah 
> Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
>         Subject:        Re: encodingStyle permitted locations
> Categories:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Marc,
>
> how about our headers? Can they have encodingStyle, even though they 
> are
> defined without one? If we want to prohibit encodingStyle on them, the
> list might grow too much. Unfortunately, I can't think of any other
> viable way to say what we seem to mean. 8-|
>
> Best regards,
>
>                    Jacek Kopecky
>
>                    Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation
>                    http://www.systinet.com/
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 16:30, Marc Hadley wrote:
>>
>> I think there's a minor problem with the current text that specifies
>> where the encodingStyle attribute can go. The current text says:
>>
>> <current>
>> The encodingStyle attribute information item MAY only appear on:
>>
>> 1.  A SOAP header block (see 5.2.1 SOAP header block).
>>
>> 2.  A child element information item of the SOAP Body element
>> information item (see 5.3.1 SOAP Body child Element).
>>
>> 3.  A child element information item of the SOAP Detail element
>> information item (see 5.4.5.1 SOAP detail entry).
>>
>> 4.  Any descendent of 1, 2, and 3 above.
>> </current>
>>
>> A SOAP Fault can be a child of the SOAP Body, but I don't think we
>> really intend to permit that. I propose we modify the text to read:
>>
>> <proposed>
>> The encodingStyle attribute information item MAY only appear on:
>>
>> 1.  A SOAP header block (see 5.2.1 SOAP header block).
>>
>> 2.  A child element information item of the SOAP Body element
>> information item (see 5.3.1 SOAP Body child Element) if that child is
>> not a SOAP Fault element information item (see ref to Fault EII).
>>
>> 3.  A child element information item of the SOAP Detail element
>> information item (see 5.4.5.1 SOAP detail entry).
>>
>> 4.  Any descendent of 1, 2, and 3 above.
>> </proposed>
>>
>> Comments ?
>>
>> Marc.
>>
>> --
>> Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
>> Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2002 14:42:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:11 GMT