RE: Proposal for dealing with root, top-level multi-refs and encodingStyle from Henrik Frystyk Nielsen on 2002-05-07 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from May 2002)

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 14:35:00 -0700
To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Martin Gudgin" <martin.gudgin@btconnect.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D05A54563@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

I like this direction although I am not sure where we stand regarding
allowing for Ids not located within the scope of a encodingStyle AII? If
we allow this, then we might just want to say something like:

"The ref AII item MAY refer to any ID which MAY but need not be within
the scope of the same encodingStyle AII. The number and placement of
such encodingStyle AIIs is not otherwise significant. In all such cases,
the result is a single edge (and therefore a single graph.)"

Henrik

>"All element information items representing serialized nodes 
>and envelopes 
>must be within the scope of  an encodingStyle="...soap 
>encoding URI..". 
>The number and placement of such encodingStyle attributes is 
>not otherwise 
>significant;  ref attribute information items MAY refer to ID's in the 
>scope of a same or different encodingStyle attribute, which 
>MAY but need 
>not be within the same SOAP body or header block.  In all such 
>cases, the 
>result is a single edge (and therefore a single graph.)"

Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2002 17:35:32 UTC