W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > May 2002

RE: Issue: Problem with ProcedureNotPresent fault subcode

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 11:31:37 -0700
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D05A5453A@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Christopher Ferris" <chris.ferris@sun.com>, <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek@systinet.com>, <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

Yup, MAY is fine - I can also live without it entirely but happy with


>> Good, I think that's a good compromise, if others agree.  I could 
>> probably
>> live without the subcode entirely, or maybe better yet, a 
>subcode that's 
>> not specific to RPC.  Why not have a general subcode: 
>> which would apply uniformly to RPC and non-RPC responses.  
>Again, I can 
>> live with ProcedureNotPresent as a MAY.  Many thanks!
Received on Monday, 6 May 2002 14:32:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:20 UTC