W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > May 2002

Re: Issue: Problem with ProcedureNotPresent fault subcode

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 10:08:27 -0400
To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
Cc: moreau@crf.canon.fr, skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFAEED7B19.3DF6E15A-ON85256BAE.004EA6B3@lotus.com>
History:  FWIW, I was involved in consideration of this issue for the 
design of 1.1.  There, we explicitly decided that a receiver was expected 
to understand the QName in the body, and from that would understand any 
conventions associated with the use of that body.  I agree with Henrik 
that it's circular (and unnecessary) to model a misunderstood Body QName 
differently for RPC than for any other use of the Body.  Not recognizing 
that it's a purchase order (presumed message style) is no different than 
not recognizing getStockQuote (presumed RPC style), IMO.  Only when you 
recognize it do you understand whether there are good mappings to the RPC 
method/args style (and as Henrik points out, the degree to which you 
actually do a nice binding to a programming language is completely private 
to your endpoint.)

Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
Received on Friday, 3 May 2002 10:26:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:20 UTC