W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > March 2002

Re: Summarizing the last 192 discussion

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 07:48:54 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200203281248.HAA15736@markbaker.ca>
To: dcrowley@scitegic.com (David Crowley)
Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> > But yes, my proposed solution to this issue when I raised it[1] was this;
> > 
> > "1) update the binding framework to state that each binding should
> > declare that the authoritative determinant of whether a message is a
> > fault or not should be the underlying protocol"
> > 
> 
> I suppose that is what worries me most!  I just don't understand
> why the intent of the message lies someplace outside of the SOAP
> Envelope.

That's the definition of the chameleon view; that the meaning of the
message transfer comes from the underlying application protocol.

I do agree that this is not how the industry is using it, but it is
the only use of SOAP consistent with Web architecture.

MB
-- 
Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc.
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.      mbaker@planetfred.com
http://www.markbaker.ca   http://www.planetfred.com
Received on Thursday, 28 March 2002 07:43:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:09 GMT