I don't think I have any more to add to this discussion at this point. It's the same old issue that we've never come to an agreement on. So, what I can extract from this discussion is this; - everybody likes the resolution to issue 12 - I like the current state tables in our HTTP binding, specifically 7.4.1.2/7.4.1.3 (of the latest editor's draft), as it reflects my view that a fault can only be processed as a fault when received with a 4xx or 5xx response code, i.e. FaultHint is never set on a 2xx (hmm, it's still only set on 500, not 4xx). - Noah and Chris appear to want to change 7.4.1.2 to say that if a fault is received on a 2xx, then FaultHint would be set to true. Does that capture the current state of things? MB -- Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. mbaker@planetfred.com http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.planetfred.comReceived on Wednesday, 27 March 2002 20:45:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:09 GMT