Re: [Fwd: Issue Gudge General a): closed ("split part 2")]

Paul,

Re. the second (internal) reference, here is the relevant excerpt. I am sorry
you were not able to read it.

Jean-Jacques.

----------------------------------------
<quote>
Chair, editors, W3C team and WG,

I took an action item at the telcon this week to trawl our mailing lists for
possible new issues. The results of looking at xmlp-comments are as follows;

There is 1 general issue against the spec, 1 issue against Part 1 and two
typos in the Primer as detailed below.

Regards

Martin Gudgin
DevelopMentor



New Issues

General

a) The commentator suggests we split the spec ( like XSL was split ) into
SOAP-Messaging, SOAP-RPC, SOAP HTTP Binding ( and possibly
SOAP-Encoding )[6]

    Comment: Comment seems to be mainly concerned with interoperability,
optionality of pieces and the different perceptions people have of 'what
SOAP is'.

    Resolution: Argue that having part 1 and part 2 is enough of a split.
<snip/>
</quote>