W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > March 2002

RE: What is SOAP?

From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 19:26:36 -0500
Message-ID: <9A4FC925410C024792B85198DF1E97E402C70A61@usmsg03.sagus.com>
To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jacek Kopecky [mailto:jacek@systinet.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 6:07 PM
> To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> Cc: Mark Baker; Stuart Williams; Noah Mendelsohn; David Fallside;
> www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: What is SOAP?
> 

> 
>  it is now obvious now that serious disagreement comes from the
> lack of the basic definition of what SOAP actually is -
> 
>  a) an extension of the web (or HTTP), or
>  b) an RPC request/response protocol on top of *a transport 
> layer*, or
>  c) simply a messaging protocol with basically every message
> being one-way (again, on top of a transport layer).

I think of SOAP 1.2 as c), although SOAP 1.0 was b) and 1.1 is somewhere
between  b) and c). Ideally, 1.2 should be general enough to be useful for
both use cases a) and b).  

I'm not sure that SOAP is *necessary* for use case a) -- URIs to identify
services, and some specific XML format to return results would suffice --
but for practical reasons it may find use there.  For example, applications
and tools might want to support a relatively seamless transition between RPC
and REST for the environments that they are most appropriate: a tool such as
VS.NET or WebLogic Workshop might use a common UI to generate web services
and let the user choose among synchronous, callback, and REST options to
generate the actual message exchange pattern. 

Does this make sense, or am I pretending that the world is cleaner than it
really is?
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2002 19:26:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:09 GMT