Re: Clarifying optionality of HTTP binding

typo: s/me/may/

also, haven't we been calling this the "default" HTTP
binding? [1]. Shouldn't we be consistent in calling it that?

Cheers,

Chris

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:

> Done :)
> 
> Henrik 
> 
> 
>><proposed>
>>"The purpose of the SOAP HTTP binding is to provide a binding 
>>of SOAP to
>>HTTP. It is important to note that use of the SOAP HTTP binding is
>>optional and that nothing precludes the specification of different
>>bindings to other protocols, or indeed to define other 
>>bindings to HTTP.
>>Because of the optionality of using the SOAP HTTP binding, it is NOT a
>>requirement to implement it as part of a SOAP node.  A node 
>>that does correctly 
>>and completely implement the HTTP binding me to be said to 
>>"conform to the 
>>SOAP 1.2 HTTP binding.""
>></proposed>
>>
> 
>