- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 14:18:25 -0800
- To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
I don't think there is anything controversial in this mail but just wanted to be sure that there are no surprises. I believe the HTTP binding provided in SOAP 1.2 part 2 Adjuncts is just one of many possible bindings (even to HTTP) and is optional to implement. As such, I think we need to clarify that in section 7 in part 2 with something like the following text: "The purpose of the SOAP HTTP binding is to provide a binding of SOAP to HTTP. It is important to note that use of the SOAP HTTP binding is optional and that nothing precludes the specification of different bindings to other protocols, or indeed to define other bindings to HTTP. Because of the optionality of using the SOAP HTTP binding, it is NOT a requirement to implement it as part of a SOAP node." Comments? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/10/11/soap12-part2.html#soapinhttp
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2002 17:18:56 UTC