W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > March 2002

Re: Rework on SOAP 1.2 Part 2: Section 2 and 3

From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 13:07:33 -0000
Message-ID: <004201c1cc22$60913d10$8601a8c0@greyarea>
To: "Herve Ruellan" <ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: "Noah Mendelsohn" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "XML Protocol Discussion" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
I think that case is covered elsewhere but I will re-read and check

Gudge

----- Original Message -----
From: "Herve Ruellan" <ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
To: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>
Cc: "Noah Mendelsohn" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>; "XML Protocol
Discussion" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: Rework on SOAP 1.2 Part 2: Section 2 and 3


> Martin Gudgin wrote:
>
>
> >>- in section 2.2, the definitions of non-terminal nodes and terminal
> >>nodes overlap. I would think that a non-terminal node has *one* or more
> >>outbound edges.
> >
> >
> > We wanted to allow an empty struct.
>
> OK. Then what about saying that non-terminal nodes do not have a lexical
> value ?
>
> Hervé
>
Received on Friday, 15 March 2002 08:08:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:09 GMT