Doesn't sound so clear to me... BTW, thanks Mark, I had never realized before we had an abstract email binding only. Jean-Jacques. Mark Baker wrote: > > Hope I'm clear enough, > > Those are fair reasons for not doing a SMTP binding, thanks for writing > them down. > > But that leaves us in the predicament that this binding does not serve > its purpose of exercising the protocol binding framework. Perhaps we > should pick another protocol?Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 10:23:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:09 GMT