W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > June 2002

Re: [getf] Node MUST process? (was: [GETF] okay, here's an updateddraftwithHenrik's option B)

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 18:17:08 +0200
Message-ID: <3CFE3984.ACFD1DB6@crf.canon.fr>
To: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, xml-dist-app@w3.org


Chris,

So may be we should use my earlier bullet points, I you think
they're easier to understand? I've loosely based <chris tweak=1/>
on them, but didn't seem to work for you.

I've got to go now.

Jean-Jacques.

Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2002 12:18:29 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen: "RE: [getf] Node MUST process? (was: [GETF] okay, here's an updateddraftwithHenrik's option B)"
Previous message: Jean-Jacques Moreau: "Re: [getf] Node MUST process? (was: [GETF] okay, here's an updateddraftwithHenrik's option B)"
In reply to: Jean-Jacques Moreau: "Re: [getf] Node MUST process? (was: [GETF] okay, here's an updateddraftwithHenrik's option B)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:10 GMT