W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > January 2002

Re: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:04:55 +0100 (MET)
To: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
cc: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>, Williams Stuart <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Noah Mendelsohn <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "marc.hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, xml-dist-app <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0201291548210.6982-100000@tarantula.inria.fr>
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Christopher Ferris wrote:

> that is effectively the implementation of the HTTP binding,
> that is responsible for interpretation of the new header,
> and responsible for returning an HTTP 204 No Content response
> to the sender. That (IMO) would be perfectly acceptable.

Note that 202 would also be valid, if you consider that the binding only
move the message from one place to another.
However you have no indication that the message has been processed.
So it really depends on what you expect from the binding.

-- 
Yves Lafon - W3C
"Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras."
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2002 10:05:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:06 GMT