W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > January 2002

Re: Section 5 vs Schema

From: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 17:43:04 +0000
Message-ID: <3C519928.3070705@sun.com>
To: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
CC: XML Protocol Discussion <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

Martin Gudgin wrote:

>Woah there! Are you asserting that in the absence of a schema you *MUST* use
>xsi:type?
>
No I wasn't, it was just an example... Rule 2 in the encoding section is 
pretty explicit and I wasn't proposing a change to that.

Marc.

Received on Friday, 25 January 2002 12:43:13 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Martin Gudgin: "Re: Section 5 vs Schema"
Previous message: Martin Gudgin: "Re: Section 5 vs Schema"
In reply to: Martin Gudgin: "Re: Section 5 vs Schema"
Next in thread: Martin Gudgin: "Re: Section 5 vs Schema"
Reply: Martin Gudgin: "Re: Section 5 vs Schema"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:06 GMT