W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > January 2002

Re: Section 5 vs Schema

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 10:31:32 -0500
Message-ID: <3C517A54.6040002@zolera.com>
To: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
CC: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>, XML Protocol Discussion <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
> The ETF discussed this issue in a recent telcon and would like to 
> propose a change to section 3.4 of the current editors draft[1] to 
> lessen the schema bias in the examples by showing the mapping from 
> programming language compound types to SOAP encoding.


great.

> or as follows if a schema is available
> 
> <e:Book xmlns:e="http://example.org/2001/12/books">
>    <e:author>Henry Ford</e:author>
>    <e:preface>Preface text</e:preface>
>    <e:intro>Henry Ford</e:intro>
> </e:Book>


If a schema is available is the following also (still) valid?
   <e:Book xmlns:e="http://example.org/2001/12/books"
	xmlns:enc="http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-encoding">
    <enc:string>Henry Ford</enc:string>
     <enc:string>Preface text</enc:string>
    <enc:string>Henry Ford</enc:string>
   </e:Book>

And various mix-and-match combinations of the two?
	/r$

-- 
Zolera Systems, http://www.zolera.com
Information Integrity, XML Security
Received on Friday, 25 January 2002 10:31:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:06 GMT