Re: New Issues

Hi Marc,

> (ii) Non-opaque URI for encodingStyle value
> 
> 4.1.1 SOAP encodingStyle Attribute
> "In addition, all URIs syntactically beginning with 
> 'http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-encoding' indicate conformance with the 
> SOAP encoding rules defined in [1](SOAP Encoding), though with 
> potentially tighter rules added."
> 
> I recall seeing this raised previously on the list but couldn't find the 
> post in the archives.

That was presumably my post;

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Jan/0027.html

> I believe that the above use of a URI is unusual, 
>    are the semantics described above desirable ?

I think the question is, are the semantics (being able to indicate
conformance to the default encoding) required?  If so, then the
mechanism for communicating those semantics should change, perhaps to
that suggested in my referenced email (assuming rdfs:subClassOf is
the desired relationship).

MB
-- 
Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc.
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.      mbaker@planetfred.com
http://www.markbaker.ca   http://www.planetfred.com

Received on Monday, 21 January 2002 11:54:00 UTC