W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > January 2002

Re: Media types

From: Edwin Ortega <ortegae@wns.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:23:37 -0800
Message-ID: <004f01c19ed4$1174b0c0$32a2583f@val6000>
To: "Paul Prescod" <paul@prescod.net>, "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
To: "Paul Prescod" <paul@prescod.net>
Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>; <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: Media types


> > > I agree with TimBL when he says;
> > >
> > > "The significance of any nesting of one withing the other is to be
defined by
> > > the nesting (outermost) specification [...]"
> > >
> > > (from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jan/0081.html )
> >
> > That's a good theory but there is at least one W3C spec that does not
> > work that way. Perhaps it needs to be fixed.
>
> I understand your point now.  Yes, this adds another dimension of
> stickiness and needs resolution.  I have some thoughts, but it's
> probably best to mull them over for a while.
>
> Note that the "[...]" I snipped from Tim's comments said;
>
> "although of course some consitency about this would be great!"
>
> 8-)
>
> MB
> --
> Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc.
> Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.      mbaker@planetfred.com
> http://www.markbaker.ca   http://www.planetfred.com
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2002 12:26:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:06 GMT