W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > January 2002

RE: Article: Fat protocols slow Web services

From: Mike Dierken <mike@dataconcert.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:43:11 -0800
Message-ID: <2AE31649CF989F4FB354F6D95EB0CE6E4D6736@xmlfmail.xmlfund.com>
To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> 
> - Use Security Socket Layer (SSL), which, as DesAutels says, 
> can also be network and server/client side time-intensive, 
> since for each transaction "you're taking SSL up and down" 

Isn't HTTP Keep-Alive supported?
If it was, would that minimize the number of new SSL connections required
for multiple req/res pairs?
Or am I mis-understanding 'transaction'?
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2002 15:44:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:05 GMT