W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > January 2002

RE: SOAP port number

From: Krishna Sankar <ksankar@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 14:01:20 -0800
To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

 | So, can we agree to *not* defining a standard port, but instead document
 | that a non-default port should be used when SOAP is used to tunnel
 | (which is a refinement on the agreement at the SJ F2F)?  We'd have to
 | define tunnel well - I think my response to Rich[1] could be used as a
 | basis for that text, in part.
 Not yet.

 Looks like an anemic response to me. If we encourage a non-default port,
why not suggest one as well. That will only help the adoption of our
recommendation. I would like to understand why RECOMMENDING a port is a bad

Received on Monday, 7 January 2002 17:01:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:17 UTC