W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > January 2002

RE: Draft registration of application/soap+xml

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 17:55:22 +0100 (CET)
To: Krishna Sankar <ksankar@cisco.com>
cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201061752180.633-100000@mail.idoox.com>
 Krishna,
 regarding the new port number: 
 I believe you can put your web service on any port number you 
wish, the URLs in form http://server:port/ are commonly accepted. 
 The port number also depends on the used protocol, in case of 
SOAP it is usually HTTP which says the default is 80. But again, 
you can use a different port.
 Do you envision we create an HTTP clone that would have a 
different URI scheme and a different default port? Why?
 Best regards,

                   Jacek Kopecky

                   Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
                   http://www.systinet.com/



On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Krishna Sankar wrote:

 > 	3.	A new port number ! Can we ask for a new well known port number for the
 > "application/soap+xml" messages ? It is high time somebody championed this
 > issue - why not us ? :o)
Received on Sunday, 6 January 2002 11:55:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:05 GMT