RE: Media type encoding parameter?

I think there is a close relationship between the intent of a message
and the type (at least as described by the SOAPAction header field). By
connecting the two, the relationship would be made explicit.

Henrik

> I don't think that this is enough of a reason for overloading
>the type. And anyway, any MIME-based protocol can add a
>SOAPAction MIME header so it _can_ translate across different
>protocols. I doubt non-MIME-based protocols would use MIME type
>in its full form, i.e. possibly with parameters. Is there such a
>protocol?