W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > January 2002

Re: Media type encoding parameter?

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:55:19 +0100 (CET)
To: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201031952580.13354-100000@mail.idoox.com>
 Chris,
 why do you think "action" (as explained for SOAPAction - the
"intent" of the message) belongs to the MIME _type_ of the
message?
 I think intent and type are two different, orthogonal things.

                   Jacek Kopecky

                   Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
                   http://www.systinet.com/



On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Christopher Ferris wrote:

 > I much prefer Henrik's suggested addition of an
 > action parameter in the mime header over the SOAPAction
 > HTTP header. I also think that charset is appropriate,
 > but that's about all.
 >
 > Cheers,
 >
 > Chris
 >
 >
 >  >  > Including "action"?  I thought Henrik described its value well.  I had
 >  >  > suggested the same thing a few months earlier too.
 >  >
 >  >  Excluding "action". This parameter (if it's what is represented
 >  > by the SOAPAction header now), IMO, does not belong to the MIME
 >  > _type_ of the message. But in any case the reasons for SOAPAction
 >  > have been considered good enough by the WG and I don't want to
 >  > object to this resolution now.
 >  >
 >  >                    Jacek Kopecky
 >  >
 >  >                    Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
 >  >                    http://www.systinet.com/
 >  >
 >  >
 >  >
 >  >
 >  >
 >
 >
 >
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2002 13:55:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:05 GMT