W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > January 2002

RE: Proposal for resolving 144, 161, 117: array serialization

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 16:13:43 -0500
To: andrewl@microsoft.com
Cc: jacek@systinet.com, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF4CBFEB50.3B9722A2-ON85256B35.00756F24@lotus.com>
Andrew Layman writes:

>> While the element names are not significant qua 
>> array element, they may be significant in other 
>> ways, such as affecting the post schema
>> validation infoset, 

Agreed, but I don't think that's pertinent to the model described in the 
encoding chapter, which is the one in question I think.  The graph model 
does not have string labels as accessor names for the members of an array, 
just positions.  The PSVI is not the level at which the graph model should 
be interpreted, I think.

Noah Mendelsohn                                    Voice: 1-617-693-4036
Lotus Development Corp.                            Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
Received on Wednesday, 2 January 2002 16:26:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:17 UTC