W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > August 2002

FW: XML Protocol WG Implementers Meeting Summary - 7/31

From: Thompson, Lynne R <Lynne.Thompson@unisys.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 23:03:15 -0500
Message-ID: <F87D090845D31F44B2D8DB6BFD3EDFEAF0D0A0@USMV-EXCH3.na.uis.unisys.com>
To: xml-dist-app@w3.org



>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Thompson, Lynne R  
> Sent:	Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:28 AM
> To:	Yin Leng Husband; akarmark@oracle.com; Alex DeJarnatt;
> asirv@webmethods.com; carine@w3.org; frystyk@microsoft.com;
> gdaniels@macromedia.com; jacek@idoox.com; John Koropchak; Thompson, Lynne
> R; Martin Gudgin; 'Goyal, Narendra'; Paul Kulchenko; skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com;
> ylafon@w3.org; Sam Ruby
> Cc:	fallside@us.ibm.com
> Subject:	XML Protocol WG Implementers Meeting Summary - 7/31
> Importance:	High
> 
> All:
> 
> Below is a summary of yesterday's meeting. Any changes and/or comments?
> 
> Lynne Thompson
> Unisys Corporation
> 
> --------------------------------------
> 
> In attendance were:
> 
> 	Sam Ruby, IBM
> 	Glen Daniels, Macromedia
> 	Alex DeJarnatt, Microsoft
> 	Martin Gudgin, Microsoft
> 	Jacek Kopecky, Systinet (IDOOX)
> 	John Koropchak, Microsoft
> 	Paul Kulchenko, SOAPBuilder
> 	Lynne Thompson, Unisys
> 	Asir Vedamuthu, WebMethods
> 
> 
> Status of Implementation Features in Table 2 as agreed upon in today's
> telecon:
> 
> #61 - Delete [3]
> 
> #62 - Delete [3]; Duplicate of # 34 rephrase to "Support
> application/soap+xml type with XML 1.0 serialization"
> 
> #1 - Split into 3 features [2]
> 	1.1 Generating and transmitting SOAP messages - initial sender,
> intermediary
> 	1.2 Receiving and processing SOAP messages - intermediary and
> ultimate receiver
> 	1.3 Relaying SOAP messages - intermediary
> 
> #2 - "Support one or more SOAP roles" 
> 
> #3 - Delete
> 
> #4 - Delete; duplicate of #2 after rephrased
> 
> #5 - Split into:
> 	5.1 http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelop/role/next 
> 	5.2 http://www.w.3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/none
> 	5.3 http://www.w.3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/ultimateReceiver
> 
> 	#5.1 is covered by assertion 8, #5.2 is covered by assertion 9; and
> #5.3 is covered by assertion 10.
> 
> #6 - No change
> 
> #63 - Delete [3]
> 
> 	Jacek noted that #63 can be deleted provided #27 is split into: [2]
> 	27.1 Supports simple data types
> 	27.2 Supports structs
> 	27.3 Supports arrays
> 	27.4 Supports generics
> 	27.5 Supports references (added)
> 
> 	No objections from other implementers.
> 
> #64 - Delete [3]
> 
> #65 - Delete [3]
> 
> #66 - Delete [3]
> 
> # 7 - Rephrase to: "Supports active intermediaries"
> 
> #67 - Delete [3]
> 
> #8 - No change
> 
> #9 - Rephrase to include all SOAP envelope elements - envelope, header,
> body, fault,..
> 	Rewording will eliminate a few of the features (e.g., # 12, 15, 16,
> 18, 20)
> 	Jacek noted that changing the description to #9 should include the
> SOAP-ENV:Fault as well.
> 	Action: Provide appropriate rewording for feature id #9 (Gudge)
> 
> #10 - Delete
> 
> #11 - Rephrase to: "Allows insignificant whitespace in SOAP envelope,
> between headers,..." [2]
> 
> 
> Other discussions:
> 
> *	After a brief discussion on the usefulness of the "Assertions"
> column, implementers agree to keep the column. Need to review assertion
> column after a final Table 2 is generated to ensure that assertions
> correspond to the right implementation feature. 
> 
> *	All implementers agreed to resend their implementation status after
> revised Table 2 is generated.
> 
> *	Asir Vedamuthu suggested to keep the feature list at a higher level.
> He expressed his concerns about getting too detailed with the features.
> 
> References:
> 
> [1] SOAP 1.1 Implementation Feature Summary
> 
> 	http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/03/soap1.2implementation.html
> 
> [2] Implementation Feature Comments from Jacek Kopecky:
> 
> 	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Jul/0163.html
> 
> [3] SOAP 1.2 Part 1 Feature List from Anish Karmarkar:
> 	
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-protocol-wg/2002Jul/0033.html
> 
> [4] Additional Implementation Feature Suggestion from Jacek Kopecky
> 
> 	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Jul/0174.html
> 
> [5] SOAP Part 2, Sections 3, 7, and 4 - Features Missing in Test
> Collection from Asir Vedamuthu
> 		
> 	
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-protocol-wg/2002Jul/0117.html
> 		
> 	
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-protocol-wg/2002Jul/0119.html
> 		
> 	
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-protocol-wg/2002Jul/0154.html
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 6 August 2002 00:03:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:10 GMT