W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > April 2002

Re: Summary of Issue 194 - encodingStyle

From: Simon Fell <soap@zaks.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 21:10:59 -0400 (EDT)
To: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <e2d9cu81r4hit2rcvhp99j2iubarld74pt@4ax.com>
FWIW, its common to have an rpc/encoded body with unencoded headers.

Cheers
Simon

On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:15:47 -0700, in soap you wrote:

>
>The fundamental question I am asking is why this should be part of the
>envelope when the envelope doesn't say anything about encoding? In
>addition, as we in general say nothing about the use of schema (or even
>which schema language), or however data may or may not be described then
>why should encoding be different?
>
>FWIW, I believe I said "Nobody seems to change encoding style in the
>middle of a graph" and not "nobody is able to change encodings in the
>middle of a graph".
>
>Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
>mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com
Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2002 21:53:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:10 GMT