W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > April 2002

RE: Issue 36: Clarify nature of conformance

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 12:35:02 -0700
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D073710B1@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <NOSPAM@oracle.com>
Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, <oisin.hurley@iona.com>

Sounds good - thanks!


>The intend was to make it absolutely clear to the reader that the doc
>does not define what it means to be 1.2 compliant, and where the reader
>should go to figure that out. I think a lot of people will look at the
>test suite to figure out conformance issues.
>How about:
>"An implementation may be said to be SOAP 1.2 conformant if and only if
>it satisfies the conformance requirements specified in SOAP 1.2
>specification. The W3C does not at this time provide for any
>comprehensive means of testing for such conformance."
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2002 15:35:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:19 UTC