W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > April 2002

RE: Qualification of Fault children (was RE: Updated proposal for issue 192)

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 07:52:18 -0700
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D05A54353@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

First let me say that I don't think this is a major issue in any way.
The primary consideration for proposing the change is consistency, both
with respect to use of qualified names and with respect to name case
consideration. The historic reason for why fault child elements are not
qualified is that it was more consistent with the SOAP encoding but I
don't think that's a concern anymore.



>I'd be ok either way, just felt that its wasn't something that 
>had been discussed much on the list. This question is also a 
>bit orthogonal to the other pieces in Henrik's proposal on 192 
>[1] - and really a different issue.
>I don't think making the names of the children a Fault 
>unqualified was an oversight. I think it was quite a 
>deliberate choice on the part of the schema maintainer - I'm 
>sure Gudge will correct me if I'm wrong about that.
Received on Thursday, 11 April 2002 10:52:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:19 UTC