Re: Proposal for cleanup of RPC section (issue 195)

 Jean-Jacques,
 I believe this would not *add* any dependency because we already
need some external source to tell us what the method signature
actually is - we need the actual names of the parameters and of
the very method that we're calling. Knowing whether there is a
return value is in the same bag of information.
 Best regards,

                   Jacek Kopecky

                   Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
                   http://www.systinet.com/



On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Jean-Jacques Moreau wrote:

 > Wouldn't this add a dependency on WSDL? I don't think we should go there.
 > 
 > Jean-Jacques.
 > 
 > Jacek Kopecky wrote:
 > 
 > > <snip/> Therefore, if
 > > the first member is meant to be the return value (and we know
 > > that from the signature), <snip/>
 >