+1 Marc Hadley wrote: > As I stated earlier, this would mean that every implementation that > supports attachments (i.e. nearly all of them) could not be said to > conform to our HTTP binding. We would be defining a set of conformance > criteria that hardly anyone would be interested in conforming with !Received on Thursday, 4 April 2002 10:59:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:09 GMT