W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > April 2002

RE: more Re: Issue 192 & R803

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 11:59:15 -0800
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D06F997A5@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Christopher Ferris" <chris.ferris@sun.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

I would think we have this already, no? That is, a SOAP fault is *only*
a SOAP fault in the processing sense *if* it is located as the first
child EII of the body EII, no?

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com

>It also gets us around the issue 192/12 debate.
>If a query returns a fault as a child element
>of the Body, it isn't a fault and can be carried
>on a 200 OK.
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2002 14:59:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:09 GMT