- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 15:58:14 +0200
- To: "Williams Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: "'Christopher Ferris'" <chris.ferris@sun.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
+1, I don't think this is quite the direction that the WG had agreed to take last Wenesday. Jean-Jacques. "Williams, Stuart" wrote: > I have a number of concerns with the direction that this is now going. > > 1) The original motivation for the discussion, as I recall, was directed at > the resolution of Issue #61 [1]. I think what is proposed in [2] is > no-longer focussed on that, indeed as far as I can tell it defines a binding > that is (possibly deliberately) incapable of supporting *any* attachment > scheme. <snip/>
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2002 09:00:20 UTC