W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > October 2001

RE: RSVP: Resolution to issue #29 satisfactory?

From: Oisin Hurley <ohurley@iona.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 13:38:43 -0000
To: "Barbara Price" <bprice@us.ibm.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AGECJKEBCGNJBAPDAFIEIEDBCNAA.ohurley@iona.com>
>I agree with Dan - using a pluggable encoding for MOF/UML models is a
>minimal solution that should work, but the preferred solution is to provide
>a mapping from MOF/UML into the SOAP object model.

I would just like to point out that SOAP doesn't have an Object Model. But
coming to SOAP/Web Services from MOF is a Good Thing, IMHO.

> We have already done
>something like this between MOF/UML and XML Schema, and believe it should
>be possible here too.  I will open an issue in the OMG XMI Task Force for
>this, and stay involved on the w3c side.

Barbara, can you explain some more please? Do you mean that SOAP based
systems would take part in the MDA approach and as such can be described
by an XMI serialization? Or do you mean that you intend to take the SOAP
'type system' and define its expression in XMI? Or do you mean that you
intend to take XMI and define its serialization in SOAP encoding? Can you
post the text of the issue that you plan to open?

Lots of questions, but would appreciate the answers, since I've a keen
interest in using XMI encoding in SOAP messages.

 cheers
  --oh
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2001 08:35:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:04 GMT