- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 18:36:38 -0800
- To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Cc: David Fallside <fallside@us.ibm.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Right. As I recall, I had made some general comments about the processing model, etc. pretty early on, which were logged as an issue; since, I believe that all of the points have been taken on by separate issues. I'd propose we call it redundant in light of later issues. On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 05:03:10PM -0800, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: > > Mark can comment further but the items being discussed including > processing ordering, optional vs. mandatory, and faults have been > addressed by other issues such as #65, #100, and #106. The issue of HTTP > status codes is addressed by #12. > > Henrik Frystyk Nielsen > mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com > > >What exactly is the item(s) of concern expressed in issue #8, > >and what is the proposal to resolve it? > > >[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues#x8 -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 29 October 2001 21:36:43 UTC