Kumeda wrote: > > Section 5 may be misleading: the text may suggest that there exists a binding > layer that provides certain functionality. However in 5.1.4 Sample Mappings > section, the tables show exactly what I modeled as Contract 4, i.e., use service > primitives provided by the underlying transport layer and use them to carry SOAP > messages. > PMFJI, but I'm a bit confused about the problem here. What's to stop me writing a binding spec that provides e.g. reliable request-response over an unreliable one way transport like UDP ? I.e. where the "binding layer provides certain functionality" like correlating requests and responses and adding reliability. I agree that the binding spec has to show how to carry SOAP messages in undelying PDUs but that is only part of the job. Am I missing something ? Regards, Marc. -- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com> XML Technology Centre, Sun Microsystems.Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2001 06:41:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:16 UTC